Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Erika Intelligence's avatar

Funny that the London drivers planning to blame the software and the research on cars explaining their own braking are in the same issue. I think that second one closes the window on the first faster than anyone expects.

Larry Fizz's avatar

So, more news about how thousands of robotaxis are being introduced into cities around the nation, followed by Waymo offering $20M to help taxi drivers in New York who would be affected by the rollout of robotaxis there.

You posed the exact question I had in mind while reading that: how much money will appease people whose livelihoods are being threatened? You write, later in this issue, how [US] taxi drivers tried to mess with Waymos on the street when Waymo first launched (which did not help the cab drivers’ case back then), however, hacks are their own breed and, personally, I’d be careful about approaching them in a shiny new car waving handfuls of money asking for a place in line at the airport. I will stay tuned here for whatever is next.

Now that Imperial College London researchers had a go at building an AI system that can explain its own collision-warning decisions in plain language, I’d like to see if they can build one that can persuade politicians to explain THEIR decisions in plain language. Levity aside, this is another real good link-- very interesting to visit and read.

Same with the video from the CVPR 2026 conference (Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition): whether driving a car or not, I sooo take for granted how well and quickly my brain makes decisions based on what it sees.

No posts

Ready for more?